The Universe Solved

 


Welcome Guest Search | Active Topics | Members | Log In | Register

And now, presenting, String Stars Options
jim
Posted: Sunday, February 22, 2009 11:13:04 PM

Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 3/19/2008
Posts: 898
Points: 2,700
RedDog
Posted: Wednesday, June 03, 2009 8:53:11 AM

Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 6/1/2009
Posts: 52
Points: 156
Location: Washington
Nice theory Jim.
It is only logical in the progression of the very small that such a string star would exist, even if for only seconds.
Since you are into a program reality, I would say that the programming behind this reality is such that we only
have to seek for such a feature and we should find it. It is the way the quantum programming seems to opperate.
I would put money on your theory being discovered eventually.
chinitial
Posted: Friday, January 15, 2010 6:13:07 AM

Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 1/12/2010
Posts: 38
Points: 114
Location: in front of your desktop
Reminds me an ancient text written thousands of years B4 superstring theory:
http://bible.cc/job/38-31.htm

In 1968, theoretical physicist Gabriele Veneziano was trying to understand the strong nuclear force when he made a startling discovery. Veneziano found that a 200-year-old formula created by Swiss mathematician Leonhard Euler (the Euler beta function) perfectly matched modern data on the strong force. Veneziano applied the Euler beta function to the strong force, but no one could explain why it worked. AHA....

In 1970, Yoichiro Nambu, Holger Bech Nielsen, and Leonard Susskind presented a physical explanation for Euler’s strictly theoretical formula. By representing nuclear forces as vibrating, one-dimensional strings, these physicists showed how Euler’s function accurately described those forces. But even after physicists understood the physical explanation for Veneziano’s insight, the string description of the strong force made many predictions that directly contradicted experimental findings. The scientific community soon lost interest in string theory, and the standard model, with its particles and fields, remained unthreatened.

Then, in 1974, John Schwarz and Joel Scherk, and independently Tamiaki Yoneya, studied the messenger-like patterns of string vibration and found that their properties exactly matched those of the gravitational force’s hypothetical messenger particle — graviton. Schwarz and Scherk argued that string theory had failed to catch on because physicists had underestimated its scope.

But I'm curious, how did Leonhard Euler get to understand some things. I'll find out....

One thing I know, the man spent most of his life in Germany & Russia. He is also commemorated by the Lutheran Church on their Calendar of Saints on 24 May – he was a devout Christian (and believer in biblical inerrancy) who wrote apologetics and argued forcefully against the prominent atheists of his time.

Isn't it interesting some authors have noticed the Genesis description of creation repeats 10 times that God did something? Let's remember the superstring theory says 6 dimensions curled or shrunk and the left over is our 3D reality plus TIME (4+6=10). I wonder if the Swiss religious scientist got his ideas reading the millenary book of Job which says in original Hebrew Orion and Pleiads DO HAVE STRINGS which eventually are loosen.

BTW, I think Christians do have ZERO knowledge about the very Bible they preach 'cos they are usually ignorant of the Hebrew or Greek. Perhaps Jew Einstein understood better based upon Spinoza philosopher and hence he believed in Pantheist God.

Quipus Incas' ropes with knots similar to the ones used by Chinese:
chinitial
Posted: Friday, January 15, 2010 6:27:53 AM

Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 1/12/2010
Posts: 38
Points: 114
Location: in front of your desktop
BTW, quipus were also a MATHEMATICAL model used by Incas using different colors and knots:





Similarly Jewish priests worn similar blue ropes as a reminder of their 613 laws (nemotechnique):
http://fotolog.terra.com.br/inca:130
http://fotolog.terra.com.br/inca:131

Inca ropes have the same code used by Sumerian... but who cares, right? Or Jai Yie Chinese system?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vey_JDdxAzc


chinitial
Posted: Friday, January 15, 2010 7:03:49 AM

Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 1/12/2010
Posts: 38
Points: 114
Location: in front of your desktop
It interests me for cosmological reasons. First of all the likeness between Sumerian and Chinese scripture as shown here:

http://www.creationism.org/csshs/v07n4p24.htm

It intrigues me because the most educated person regarding Incas’ quipus is professor of anthropology, Gary Urton, who has studied 450 out of 600 quipus available in Peru, Chile, USA and Germany ; and he discovered the binary code of the Incas makes a total of 1536 unities based upon number 7 just like Sumerian scripture with 1500 signs.

It surprises me because proto- Sumerian scripture has been discovered both in Peru and Sumeria:

http://www.world-mysteries.com/sar_8.htm

http://www.atlantisbolivia.org/atlantisboliviapart4.htm

http://www.atlantisbolivia.org/boliviaandthesumerianconnection.htm

Specially the comparison between units of measurement used by Sumerian and people from the Andes, Sumerian cubits:
http://www.atlantisbolivia.org/tiwanakucalendar.htm

Mostly because the Sumerian number is related to cycles of precession and they didn’t start counting or learning the numbers like we do, beginning with 0, 1, 2 until 10 fingers of the hand but started out in a number which is more than 12 million in sexagesimal system.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexagesimal

An example quoted by Th.G. Pinches (Some Mathematical Tablets of the British Museum) began with the following lines at the top:

1. 12960000 its 2/3 part 8640000
2. its half part 6480000
3. its third “ 4320000
4. its fourth “ 3240000

...and continued all the way down through “its 80th part 180000” to the 400th part “[which is] 32400.”

Other tablets carried the procedure down to the 16,000th part (equals 810), and there is no doubt that this series continued downward to 60, the 216,000th part of the initial number 12,960,000. H. V. Hilprecht (The Babylonian Expedition of the University of Pennsylvania), after studying thousands of mathematical tablets from the temple libraries of Nippur and Sippar and from the library of the Assyrian king Ashurbanipal in Nineveh, concluded that the number 12,960,000 was literally astronomical—that it stemmed from the phenomenon of Precession, which retards the zodiac constellation against which the Sun rises by a full House once in 2,160 years.
The complete circle of the twelve Houses, by which the Sun returns to its original background spot, thus takes 25,920 years; the number 12,960,000 represented five hundred such complete Precessional circles.

Now, considering the procession of the equinoxes "was discovered" by watching the sun shift every year by some Greek philosopher who copied that idea from Middle East older people...
Well it takes 72 years for the sun to shift 1% I don't think ancient people would get the number 12.960.000 by making a generational line of observation, the son waits for the father observation about 72 years and then tells another man from the generation of the grandson and going on...
chinitial
Posted: Friday, January 15, 2010 7:15:35 AM

Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 1/12/2010
Posts: 38
Points: 114
Location: in front of your desktop
Users browsing this topic
Guest


Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Main Forum RSS : RSS

Universe Solved Theme Created by Jim Elvidge (Universe Solved)
Powered by Yet Another Forum.net version 1.9.1.2 (NET v2.0) - 9/27/2007
Copyright © 2003-2006 Yet Another Forum.net. All rights reserved.
This page was generated in 0.103 seconds.