The Universe Solved

 


Welcome Guest Search | Active Topics | Members | Log In | Register

Does somebody know what Vacuum is ? Options
socratus
Posted: Tuesday, February 12, 2013 12:00:18 AM

Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 9/30/2012
Posts: 35
Points: 105
Location: Israel
Does somebody know what Vacuum is ?
No, we don’t know what Vacuum is.
1
Paul Dirac wrote:
‘ The problem of the exact description of vacuum, in my opinion,
is the basic problem now before physics. Really, if you can’t correctly
describe the vacuum, how it is possible to expect a correct description
of something more complex? ‘
2.
The most fundamental question facing 21st century physics will be:
What is the vacuum? As quantum mechanics teaches us, with
its zero point energy this vacuum is not empty and the word
vacuum is a gross misnomer!
/ Prof. Friedwardt Winterberg /
3.
Wikipedia :
“ Unfortunately neither the concept of space nor of time is well defined,
resulting in a dilemma. If we don't know the character of time nor of space,
how can we characterize either? “
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spacetime
4.
"Now we know that the vacuum can have all sorts of wonderful effects
over an enormous range of scales, from the microscopic to the cosmic,"
said Peter Milonni
from the Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico.
5.
‘ All kinds of electromagnetic waves ( including light’s)
spread in vacuum . . . . thanks to the vacuum, to the specific
ability of empty space these electromagnetic waves can exist.’
/ Book : To what physics was come, page 32. R. K. Utiyama. /
==.
So, we know that the vacuum is very important conception in physics
and nature, but . . . but . . . we don’t know what vacuum is, and therefore
is possible to have many speculations including metaphysical too.
For example: Danah Zohar wrote:

‘It might even give us some ground to speculate that
the vacuum itself (and hence the universe) is ‘conscious’.
/ Book ‘The quantum self ’ page 208. /
#
‘If we were looking for something that we could conceive
of as God within the universe of the new physics, this ground
state, coherent quantum vacuum might be a good place to start.’
/ Book ‘The quantum self ’ page 208, by Danah Zohar. /
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Danah_Zohar

The question is:
How is it possible to prove Zohar’s metaphysical confirmation
with physical laws and formulas?
==.
Socratus
===.
socratus
Posted: Tuesday, February 12, 2013 12:01:07 AM

Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 9/30/2012
Posts: 35
Points: 105
Location: Israel
How to understand Vacuum: T=0K ?
==.
Physics (classical + quantum) lives under shadow of Vacuum.
I want throw light on this Vacuum.
Three theories explain the Vacuum T=0K :
a) theory of ideal gas because its temperature is T=0K,

b) QED theory because this theory explain interaction
photon / electron not only with matter but with vacuum too,

c) Euler’s equation: e^ i(pi) = - 1, because only in the
negative vacuum T=0K can exist ‘ virtual imaginaries particles’
which Euler described by his formula: e^ i(pi) + 1= 0.

d) The global conservation of energy is infinite .
And this infinite energy belong to the vacuum because that
more than 90% of mass ( dark mass/energy ) is hidden in the vacuum
How to understand vacuum's infinity ?
Vacuum's infinity has only one physical parameter: T=0K.
This physical parameter is the key to understand the essence of Existence.
=.
Without Vacuum T=0K there isn’t Physics,
there isn’t Philosophy of Physics.
====.
Best wishes.
Israel Sadovnik Socratus.
==============.
Users browsing this topic
Guest


Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Main Forum RSS : RSS

Universe Solved Theme Created by Jim Elvidge (Universe Solved)
Powered by Yet Another Forum.net version 1.9.1.2 (NET v2.0) - 9/27/2007
Copyright © 2003-2006 Yet Another Forum.net. All rights reserved.
This page was generated in 0.048 seconds.