Rank: Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 3/6/2009
Posts: 25
Points: 75
Location: Tegucigalpa
|
This is a video I found that explains scientifically how we are actually living in our minds, and this 'reality' is simply a dream which we think is our true state quick red pillI suggest watching part 1, and 3 although it has religious content
We are the gamers constantly programming our experience
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 3/19/2008
Posts: 981
Points: 2,955
|
Thanks for posting. The video is spot on, with one exception. It doesn't prove that reality is only in the mind. It kind of claims that it is, but really only offers the possibility, which is pretty much all you can do. It is a good video interpretation of what I outlined in my book; pages 135-142. Figures are posted on the Coast to Coast site from last year's interview: http://www.coasttocoastam.com/gen/page2419.html?theme=light
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 3/30/2008
Posts: 435
Points: 1,132
Location: USA
|
I am watching (listening) the YouTube videos as I am responding. Don't you think it is a little weird for this to show up in my reality right now? Afterall, I read Jim's book sometime I think early last year (2008); we have been posting here in this forum for months ( I think Neo has 189 posts); and yet there has now surfaced these movies which apparently have been produced since 2004. There is even a whole kind of religious following going on here.
Wow! right under our noses.
I still do worry about this kind of information going out to some freaked out kid in Afghanistan who is just looking for an excuse to strap a suicide bomb onto his back. What's the difference, if this is all just illusion anyway? Why not kill as many as I can while on my way to paradise? -- scary thought!
On April 23, 2009, I am publishing the cognitive causality algorithm, which is quite simple, but probably (along with this site, the harun yahya site, and others) marks the beginning of the "singularity."
Once we know that 1)reality is created; 2) my reality is not exactly the same as yours; and 3) the subroutine of my reality is yet in some form in sync with your reality as you are reading this post; then, this program may achieve the power to create its own intelligent (self-aware) sub-reality.
<>
:start
Set belief =0
Set true=a
Set trust=b
Set false=c
Run input confidence
If confidence=null
Set confidence=1 input truth input lies input truth
:ask First Iteration Second Iteration Third Iteration
ask question
if confidence=1
set userinput=trust answer=x
confidence=1
x=trust answer=z
confidence=0
z=trust answer=x
x=trust
:act
if trust=true goto endtrue
if trust=false goto enlie
if belief=1 goto knowledge
if x=a;x≠a
if x=c;x≠c
if 0=1;0≠1
if z=x;z≠x
if z=c;z≠c
if 1=1;1=1
if x=x;x=x
if x=z;x≠z
if 0=1;0≠1
:endlie
output ‘I don’t believe’
goto reveal
I don’t believe
:entrue
output ‘I will trust’
goto knowledge
I will trust
:guess
output ‘I see, ‘trust’’
I see,x
:reveal
run input belief
if belief=1
set trust=true
set ‘true’=trust
else
set false=trust
goto ask
belief=1
x=true
x=trust
belief=0
false=z
:knowledge
output ‘I know ‘true’’
run input confidence
pause/continue
if confidence=1
if confidence=0
if belief=1
goto guess
else
goto reveal </>
I know x
continue
I know x
pause
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 3/30/2008
Posts: 435
Points: 1,132
Location: USA
|
A14I/I,
"Unity" was never "1ness". Unity by definition means that you must take all that is good and diverse about two or more things or beings and join them together in purpose. "1ness" on the other hand, means to conform completely and become exactly the same thing.
Together in purpose does not mean conformity -- or a require that each of the two or more must give up their uniqueness. In Western thought, this "1ness" or giving up of one's freedom of choice or free agency is abhorrent. 1ness would merely mean to automate us and take away our very animation that makes us self-aware.
In order to achieve Unity with the programmer(s) you must progress in faith. The very purpose of "1ness" is to remove that faith or "willfullness" from us. This is difference between oneness and unity; if you have a will, your very "will" is at the heart of what has been called the war in heaven. While in the world and in the program, the difference between oneness and unity with the programmer(s) may seem nothing more to you than semantics (slight difference of meaning in language), but this turning over our "will" in purpose is at the heart of our "test" here inside the world (program).
And this returns us to the ultimate purpose for the programmers and why they have made our world to begin with -- that as mankind can endeavor to obtain by degrees a more intimate and familiar knowledge of self and his affections, the knowledge of the opportunity for true companionship is no small thing when for many people, the possibility of isolation is truly one of the most feared of fears. It is no small thing therefore, to contemplate whether any being outside ourselves truly exists. Becoming "One" with your creator would mean that the "One" is alone!
Thus the purpose of mankind is that he might have joy. And the purpose of the programmer(s) (Allah, God, Jehova, Bhagavan, Yodhehvahvheh ... they actually don't like you to use a name) is to bring to pass the eternal lives of mankind so that they may commune with the programmers -- not in "1ness" but in unity.
You are not alone.
|
