Jim, is this not what we have said in here before? i.e. that once we realize how quantum particles behave, we also have to accept that quantum systems, like ourselves, also must be subject to these laws and behave like quantum particles. It is that "macro-quantum spookiness" that we experience every day.
Do you know I rewrote the form of Bell's inequality this way:
I mean, I use X and Y when really they are both X, but the "ontic" of course meaning "ontological" and "phenom" meaning "epi-phenomenal."
I also call this " the XrelXstat" nature of perception. The reason the math works out right is only because it always takes at least two brain cells to form an imagination.
And I wish to both take credit for this formula and not take credit because it really only is Bell's inequality. But I kind of pat myself on the back, that writing it out this way, is a whole lot easier to understand than Jon Stewart Bell.
This really needs its own topic in here. But of late, there are not that many of us in the world who have had their "Alices Bobbed" in this way. This topic you opened with the new Schroedigner's cat is a great place to introduce Bell's Theorem written this way.
