Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 10/18/2010 Posts: 41 Points: 123 Location: USA
|
Ryan Bradley over at Popular Science recently wrote an article addressing performance-enhancing body modifications including drugs, prosthetics and bionic limb extensions. It makes me wonder what future athletes will be like. What changes will future societies make in reaction to super human strength, enhanced vision and perhaps even intelligence boosters? -TheArchitect
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 3/21/2008 Posts: 580 Points: 1,643 Location: Ireland
|
I believe that major changes will be required by society. I mean, take artificial red blood cells, which are said to be coming 'online' shortly. These are set to increase our aerobic capabilities to an unheard of degree. The person in the street will be able to avail of them, so it stands to reason that they will be available to athletes also. Blood doping? I'd say rather that it's our evolution in motion, that the goalposts are shifting.
There is no spoon.
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 3/19/2008 Posts: 981 Points: 2,955
|
I completely understand Bradley's point and have also believed for a number of years now that "enhancement" is inevitable. Already, the age of those legendary numbers is past. Babe Ruth's season record of 60 home runs stood for 34 years and then some (given that it happened during a 154 game season). Roger Maris' record lasted for 37 for a 162 game season. Then, suddenly, in the age of steroids, Sammy Sosa hits 66 in 1998, Mark McGwire hits 70 the same year, and Barry Bonds hits 73 just 3 years later. Some day we will look back on 1998 as the end of the pre-performance enhancement era, at least as far as baseball is concerned. It is a train that has already left the station. Once steroids were illegal, steroid precursors were used. Is there really much of a distinction? Neo makes a great point about artificial red blood cells. There will certainly be many more examples of enhancements to come along in the future; chemical, biological, synthetic, nanotech, or other. At some point, the record keepers will run out of asterisks. The general public will be able to afford many more enhancements beyond simple breast augmentation or pec implants, including retinal implants, memory enhancements, artificial limbs, bio-feedback systems, and more. Soon, anyone with a few extra thousand dollars will be fitter, smarter, and better looking. Of course, it wouldn't make much sense to force professional athletes to refrain from the kinds of enhancements that the general public get to take advantage of. What will sports be like then?
I imagine that leagues comprised of pure unenhanced humans will become antiquated, like members of the Amish community. They will not attract the kinds of advertising dollars that the pro-enhancement leagues, started by the likes of Vince McMahon, will attract. Teams will still compete for players based on skill and stats, although those stats will then be due to a little more than just natural ability. The sports fans won't miss a beat.
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 7/5/2010 Posts: 80 Points: 255
|
Beyond this... Can you imagine what neuro-enhancements would be capable of? Super Intelligence? Super Psi? That might be the next step on this journey.
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 10/18/2010 Posts: 41 Points: 123 Location: USA
|
Although science and technologies are growing at a rapid pace medical related science is actually developing a little slower. The human body is an exceedingly complicated collection of many complex interacting systems. I suspect that sports related performance boosters and beauty enhancements will be the most dominate body modifications for several years to come. I believe medical related modifications would soon follow. There is currently a large amount of research going into retinal photo-receptors and how this data is communicated to the brain. Its really quite interesting because they have recently found that the images are actually spatially compressed. In laymen terms this is essentially similar to saying your eye is making a compressed 'JPEG' image and sending it down the optic nerve cable. Although the implementations are very much quite different. There is also similar auditory research investigating the inner workings of the ear. Unfortunately if you spend an entire weekend checking into how far this research has come... you will find that we seem to be complete amateurs at reverse engineering carbon based machines. I am not as optimistic as Kurzweil and I believe that we are several decades away from these types of visual/auditory/intelligence enhancements. I would postulate that it is much easier for humans to build a computer with these types of super abilities than it is to reverse engineer their own. -TheArchitect
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 7/5/2010 Posts: 80 Points: 255
|
Agreed. Not sure what the timeline is. Although, since I work with researchers, the problem isn't necessarily theoretical or even technological, especially in the case of human enhancement. The pace of medical related science is somewhat dictated by testing and absorption of the technology. I mean, not sure how many people are volunteering for experimental brain surgery. It's a little easier to test physical and cosmetic enhancements. Theoretically there are several roads to neural enhancement, though. One of the most far-out approaches is brain-control interface (BCI) using, as you mentioned, AGI.
|