|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 3/21/2008 Posts: 580 Points: 1,643 Location: Ireland
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 7/15/2008 Posts: 114 Points: 257 Location: nyc
|
ah!--finally some provacative discussion about where the universe[s] may have originated--seems like for the longest time all we hear about is what it consists of --what it is doing--where it is going--etc. but very little speculation about where the hell did it come from--i would be interested in hearing any of our members views about the origins of this enigma we find ourselves part of---
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 3/30/2009 Posts: 448 Points: 1,347 Location: N.Lewisburg,OH,US
|
So the Universe is holographic? Maybe I'm not thinking about this quite right, I'm thinking of the Universe as what some might think of as the Multiverse, I think of the two as holographic, non-local and all. The article makes sense to me.
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 3/30/2009 Posts: 448 Points: 1,347 Location: N.Lewisburg,OH,US
|
I'd also thought that if the Universe expands forever it would expand to the point that an elementary particle would look out and see nothing but space, space continues expanding until the particle is ripped open, creating the Universe. Holographic again.
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 3/19/2008 Posts: 981 Points: 2,955
|
My current favorite non-"Programmed Reality" theory is biocentrism, courtesy of Dr. Robert Lanza. Check it out: http://www.robertlanza.com/I think that it can fully be understood in the context of Programmed Reality, which again is really the higher level TOE. Another topic on my blog 2 do list.
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 6/1/2009 Posts: 52 Points: 156 Location: Washington
|
jim wrote:My current favorite non-"Programmed Reality" theory is biocentrism, courtesy of Dr. Robert Lanza. Check it out: http://www.robertlanza.com/I think that it can fully be understood in the context of Programmed Reality, which again is really the higher level TOE. Another topic on my blog 2 do list. I'm glad you brought up Dr. Lanza's work to tie in the biology of consciousness with the creation of the Universe. In most simple of terms, Lanza proposes that consciousness itself, the primordial observer is creating the Universe. This very bight guy (The movie `Good Will Hunting' is based in part on him) see's everything as wave forms of potentiality which only collaspes into matter once observed. What is not addressed by Lanza, is who, or what created this unique simulation. Was there an originating consciousness? If you combine Lanza's theory with Poplawski's, what should happen, is that Poplawski's theory should be proven mathematically as valid. What I like to call the `seek and ye shall find' subroutine which is running in this simulation. As long as it generally conforms to the master program, the granularity will collaspe into reality.
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 7/15/2008 Posts: 114 Points: 257 Location: nyc
|
yea red dog--who or what created this "universe"---as another of my provacative hypothisis' what if perhaps what seems so enormous to us--[the size of this universe and now finally the serious thought by experts given to multiple universes etc.] is nothing more to those who created it but a speck under magnification no larger than what would be to us a quark or meson and they have no idea at all what is going on inside this or these universes and the object of whatever they have created has nothing to do at all with what is going on that they have no knowledge of --do we know what is going on inside a neutrino?---
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 3/19/2008 Posts: 981 Points: 2,955
|
I think the "who" behind the universe may remain elusive for awhile. But, hints exist in the experiences described during NDEs, which have remarkable similarities to those described in shamanistic experiences, past life regressions (see Brian Weiss and others), and Edgar Cayce's readings. Most of these subjects didn't know each other, nor were even aware of the typical nature of such experiences.
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 9/7/2010 Posts: 56 Points: 71 Location: BC, Canada
|
jim wrote:I think the "who" behind the universe may remain elusive for awhile. But, hints exist in the experiences described during NDEs, which have remarkable similarities to those described in shamanistic experiences, past life regressions (see Brian Weiss and others), and Edgar Cayce's readings. Most of these subjects didn't know each other, nor were even aware of the typical nature of such experiences. Indeed Jim, its like its all stored & filed. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Sixth_SenseThere is a cool scene where HJO as the psychic boy, is seeing into a buildings past where people were hung. http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_wnBRIqGPekw/StIrYjGCRdI/AAAAAAAAAa0/HVRNsMqTCfY/s400/Hanging.jpgTime as an information pattern has stored an immensity of data-layers. The boy was tapping into the buildings serious past & was able to perceive what had taken place. http://www.imdb.com/media/rm149455104/tt0167404I still consider it to be the best movie by MNS. But I can hardly wait to see his next movie. http://www.imdb.com/media/rm3398926592/tt1314655http://www.thenightchronicles.com/devil/http://www.imdb.com/media/rm940081920/tt1314655Beware, this movie might tear a hole through your soul. "BAD THINGS HAPPEN FOR A REASON" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M._Night_Shyamalan
|
|
Guest |