jim wrote:With respect to the programmed reality point of view, there would be no need for all of those parallel universes. That theory was postulated to get around the messiness of the wavefunction collapse and some of the paradoxes that arise from that (Copenhagen) interpretation.
The resistance created against a paradigm shift is due the fear of the materialistic science establishment to loose their preeminence. They behave like a dictatorship in science, commanding to others what they should believe and what not. Their fear manifest in a dogmatic behaving, controlling, debunking, spreading misinformation, hiding facts and so on. Naturally there is no conspiracy behind all this, I don't believe in such a thing, but for sure there is a dogmatic spirit influencing the establishment.
Parallel Universes, Dark Energy, Dark Matter, ... all evident lacks in the knowledge of materialistic science. They have already reached their borders of knowledge, the edge of their own set limits. This is also the reason why they invest billions in huge particle accelerators. If the materialistic scientist would accept the
true implications of the fact that consciousness is the fundament of everything, than they would also need to accept that there is a God and spiritual beings, and whatever they do ... someone still
observe them and they are not anymore the "gods" of science, but just some looser playing with science.
Because materialistic scientists are interconnected with the materialistic society, the resistance against the paradigm shift derives for the most part from the society as a whole or as a collective.
I mean, for me the question "why do they not accept some aspects of QM" is more important than the question "how does this Universe work". Why? Because I believe that every person creates his own reality and the intersection of all individual realities together forms the world. Changing the world view of every individual would change the world.
