Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 9/30/2012
Posts: 35
Points: 105
Location: Israel
|
Infinity: fact, fiction, solution.
=====
Physicists don’t create physical laws.
Physical laws are independent from humans.
The physical laws were existed before the first physicist was born.
Fact .
The critical density of all mass in the Universe is so low that
it cannot “close” the Universe into sphere and therefore the
Universe as whole is “open” / “flat” , endless, infinite.
Fiction .
This fact is dismissed / ignored by scientific community.
They say: “ if in theory infinity appears – the theory is wrong.
Why physicists don’t adopt the “infinity” as a fact?
Because they don’t know that to do with “infinity”.
“Infinity” means no borders. So, the problem is:
“ how infinity can be limited ”
Solution.
In my opinion, if “infinity” has concrete physical parameter (s)
then it is no problem to understand its function, its ability.
=.
Zero vacuum is an infinite continuum in the condition T=0K.
“Ideal gas” has the same condition : T=0K.
According to the “Quantum theory” vacuum is some kind
of energetic / energy space. It is possible to use these two theories
in order to understand “the limits and abilities of infinity” and
the initial conditions of Existence.
=====…
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 3/30/2008
Posts: 435
Points: 1,132
Location: USA
|
The Omphalos hypothesis is a creationist theory asserting that the universe was created to appear very, very old (or simply "mature") despite being created not that long ago. The "Last Thursday" variety is a parody of the omphalos hypothesis, and a relative of Bertrand Russell's equally parodic five minutes ago hypothesis.
Wiki Explanation:
"Last Thursdayism (sometimes Last Tuesdayism or Last Wednesdayism) refers to the idea that the universe may have been created last Thursday, but with the physical appearance of being billions of years old. Under this notion, people's memories, history books, fossils, light already on the way from distant stars, and so forth would all have been formed at the time of creation (last Thursday) in a state that causes them to appear to be older. It forms both a philosophical point about how our observations may not match with "reality" and a reductio ad absurdum of some young-Earth creationist ideas; if the world was created 6000 years ago with the appearance of being made billions of years ago, what stops us simply claiming it was made last Thursday in the same manner? "
And what is that T=OK? Sorry if I missed an earlier post. I look at a lot of equations in mechanics and I may have seen this one, but it is not ringing a bell inside my limited brain right at the moment.
|
